How is capacity deployment adapting to markets like CA and FL where rate increases range from 30% - 400% for property?
Nov 26, 2025
The recent news of another sizeable rate hike filing (35.8% by California’s state backed FAIR plan) to manage rising wildfire CAT loss costs is pause to consider what’s happened over the past three years - and why we believe these system shocks will forever change capacity sourcing and deployment. Let’s take a look at three trends on why we believe capacity management is at a cross road (yes AI has a lot to do with it too…). But first a primer…
The rise of non-peak perils….
Howden Re sums it up as ‘… perils once deemed ‘secondary’, such as severe convective storms (SCS), floods and wildfires, have become more dominant in aggregate, outpacing traditional ‘peak’ perils like tropical cyclones, earthquakes and European windstorms. Over the past decade, the five-year running average for non-peak peril losses has surpassed that of peak perils.’
Carriers have reacted with restricting exposure…
In 2023, seven of the top 12 property insurers in California decided to pause or restrict writing business in the state due to CAT losses mainly from wildfires. This included the largest property insurer in the state, State Farm, and the fourth largest, Allstate. In 2023, State Farm stopped selling new policies and in March of 2024 announced that it would not be renewing policies for existing customers. In Florida, many insurers have stopped writing property policies in the state. Some insurers have gone insolvent. The problem in Florida has been going on longer than that in California. Florida’s residual market, Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (CPIC), is the largest property insurer in the state with over 1 million policies and $4 billion in premium. Analysis of policy data shows that in 2024, insurers in Florida and California canceled nearly 3% of homeowners policies, a more-than fivefold increase compared with prior years.
…or increasing rates
Allstate received approval for an average 34% homeowners premium increase in CA starting November 2024, reported as the largest approved increase that year amid the state’s property insurance crisis. Following an interim 17% approval, State Farm pursued additional increases taking the total toward ~30% in CA homeowners, with rating-agency downgrades highlighting catastrophe exposure and capital strain. Statewide, Florida homeowners premiums are up roughly 45% in five years, though the pain is concentrated in high-exposure areas. In some Central Florida and coastal ZIP codes, increases to the order of 60–80% over five years are common, and there are documented cases where individual households have seen premiums climb several-fold — up to about 400%
…but things have been looking up hesitantly Q4 of 2025
Farmer’s Insurance in California, whose home-owners insurance had been capped at 9,500 new policies a month, announced late November 2025 that it has removed the cap on the number of homeowners policies it offers. Starting Jan 2026 it will market directly to approximately 300,000 customers in distressed areas. This indicates better risk models both on the cedent’s and re-insurers sides for their typical quota share and excess of loss treaties. The market is showing a softening trend for preferred risks but admitted carriers still face a hard or worsening market for CAT exposure.
So what does this mean for the complex and oft opaque mechanics of capacity deployment?
Trend No. 1 - The lifeblood of the Insurance industry - underwriting - is at a premium
Capacity is going to chase underwriting more strongly than ever before. But it is at a premium and the MGAs and Insurtechs are stepping up especially in the surplus markets.
In 2023, The MGA market grew 13% over a one-year period while property-casualty premium grew by just 10%. There is a fundamental shift happening in distribution side towards MGAs with advanced and relevant underwriting departments. especially in the surplus markets, where admitted carriers have struggled. According to Insurance Business Mag “Capacity providers are recognizing that MGAs offer something they cannot always replicate in-house. Whether it is underwriting insight into an emerging risk, the ability to tap into specialist distribution, or the agility to develop products quickly, MGAs are increasingly the channel through which insurers can experiment, diversify, and grow. “ However solving the underwriting skill gap is easier said than done. As multiple industry reports—from McKinsey, AM Best, and PwC—show, the real scarce resource in today’s insurance market isn’t capital. It’s underwriting skill. The industry has shifted from a growth-at-all-costs mindset to an environment where underwriting excellence is at a premium.
And one could argue this skill is a combination of technical expertise, technology advancement but most importantly local domain knowledge of the risk. The first two can be taught or built but the last is experience. Hence cue the independent distribution channels, local, specialized and looking for capacity at an alarmingly fast rate - a perfect segway into trend no. 3, but first AI…
Trend no. 2 - AI just joined the chat - and it’s decided to stay
Predicting what AI can do is in itself changing faster than you can publish the thought piece. Such is the exponential growth and learning curves that LLMs gobble up daily. In 2023 predictions were made on the impact of AI to underwriting. In 2025 AI is itself helping write the prediction of what it can do for underwriting…
According to Accenture, automating underwriting processes could allow for efficiency gains of up to US$ 160 billion by 2027. The requirements: Streamlining the underwriting process, reducing the time and resources needed to underwrite a policy, and increasing profitability through more accurate policy pricing and advanced risk assessment. And the market is reacting strongly. As expert.ai points out, a risk engineer or even a team of engineers cannot manually read every document nor personally inspect every property. Existing digital solutions that simply read text are inadequate for risk engineers because they need to correlate details and cross-reference data across all the sources you’re using for analysis. This is where the power of AI and its strengths in analyzing and correlating information become critical allies for the risk engineering process.
In CAT losses, the traditional simulations often fall short. Flood models designed to measure the same risk have yielded conflicting outcomes. Wildfire models can struggle to accommodate the dizzying number of variables in play—everything from the role of human intervention to the possible flight path of a wind-borne ember. Humans would find it nearly impossible to perform such a detailed model and analysis, especially if a portfolio contains thousands or millions of homes. AI has now become invaluable to insurers seeking to price the risk, set premiums and have enough capital to pay claims from the worst catastrophe losses. Across the spectrum of players AI investment has jumped to the forefront. Zurich IG AG, Verisk, Munich Re, Zest AI..the list of AI powered capabilities and investment is all prevalent.
AI is the chat now…but capacity is chasing these AI models on broken rails built decades ago. A better segway into trend no. 3
Trend no. 3 - Speed of deploying capacity got passed like it's standing still by the distribution side
MGAs are once again moving to the forefront. Nearly a century ago, Managing General Agents rose to prominence in the U.S. for reasons that look remarkably similar to today’s environment. Faced with geographic, regulatory, and operational constraints, Northeast-based insurers relied on trusted local agents in the South and West, granting them underwriting and claims authority so they could serve markets without building full branch infrastructures. Today, elevated CAT risks, regulatory friction, and the difficulty of deploying capacity quickly are creating a similar resurgence — MGAs are filling the gaps with speed, specialization, and local expertise.
But capacity remains a challenge. While longer contracts and stronger relationships are emerging among established players, many smaller MGAs still operate under 90-day termination clauses. During recent hard market conditions, this left some scrambling to renew or expand capacity. This has also stifled innovation resulting in capacity sitting on the shelf and gaps in coverage that shouldn’t be there.
While the risks of deploying capacity faster often goes against the accepted principles from incumbent capacity providers - that of established trust, proven underwriting prowess and experienced teams, the change is here and making a strong case for momentum in 2026. As Insurance Business Mag puts it - Capacity is evolving, diversifying, and increasingly aligned with the strengths that MGAs bring to the market. If 2025 was about building confidence, 2026 will be about accelerating growth, harnessing data, technology, and collaboration to unlock new classes of risk and create more resilient partnerships.
Konduit, an AI native platform, is pioneering a marketplace where capacity demand and supply is more efficient - thus vastly improving the need and speed for protection in the E&S market. What are your thoughts on our trends? Engage with us and let's build together….



